The President has requested the members of his office to abide by the Code of Ethics for the President of the General Assembly during the discharging of their mandate in the service of the General ...

The written code of conduct nods at the public pressure the Court is facing, but it can’t do much to change the justices’ behavior.

After much hemming and hawing, the Supreme Court has finally adopted a formal code of ethics. The rules—the first of their kind the high court has ever instituted—are a credit to the calls for ...

Recent concerns about leaks of US Supreme Court decisions and Justice Clarence Thomas’s refusal to recuse himself in a case that might involve connections to his wife, Virginia Thomas, have spurred ...

“Although the Justices consult the Code, along with other sources, for guidance when performing their judicial duties, the Court is not presently subject to a defined body of general ethical ...

The code consists of 10 principles that the judges ruled must be followed as both a matter of medical ethics and a matter of international human rights law.

The story renewed calls for the court to adopt a formal ethics code. Although the court is subject to some federal laws governing gift disclosure, it has no formal code of ethics.

The Supreme Court’s new ethics code is a joke The code is so weak that it serves to legitimize Clarence Thomas’s corruption. It is literally worse than nothing.

But an ethics code won't fix the Supreme Court's legitimacy crisis, Noah Feldman writes at Bloomberg, if only because the justices would end up enforcing it themselves.

Calls for a formal ethics code for the country’s highest court have been increasing in recent months.